Climate Change and Agriculture in Nepal

Background

The increasing speed of climate change and its effects on people's lives have become a major topic of discussion in recent years. While the extent of climate change and its impacts across different times and places can be debated, there is general agreement that poorer countries will suffer more, despite contributing less to the problem. In fact, The Independent (UK, May 9, 2007) suggests that the gap between rich and poor nations will likely worsen due to the effects of climate change. Since it’s now understood that human activities, especially in wealthier nations, have played a big role in speeding up climate change, making positive changes to those activities might slow it down a bit. However, future climate change is expected to occur more rapidly than it has in the past or present.

Climate change and its consequences

The earth's atmosphere works like a greenhouse. Greenhouse gases, which include water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), halocarbons, and nitrous oxide (N2O), trap some of the sun's energy and help regulate the earth's temperature. Without this natural greenhouse effect, the earth's average temperature would not be the current +15°C but would drop to -18°C, making life impossible.

Though it's known that the earth's climate has always been changing, human activities—like modern lifestyles, gas emissions from cars and industries, burning fossil fuels, and cutting down forests—have raised the levels of greenhouse gases to dangerous levels. This has caused climate change to speed up much faster than at any time in the last 10,000 years. Over the past century, global temperatures have risen by 0.3 to 0.6°C, with most of the increase happening in the last 40 years. If no global action is taken, scientists predict that the average temperature could rise by 1.4 to 5.8°C in the next 100 years, leading to more severe consequences than any natural disasters recorded in the past 100,000 years (NRCS, 1995).

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) forecasts that while some places like Canada, northern Europe, and parts of the Soviet Union may benefit from higher crop productivity due to climate change, regions like sub-Saharan Africa, southern Europe, and southern Asia could see significant drops in crop production. The IPCC also notes that while the exact impacts and speed of climate change may vary by region, it's generally agreed that: (a) higher global temperatures will change rainfall patterns, lead to extreme weather, and may raise sea levels, threatening freshwater supplies; (b) sensitive ecosystems, such as mountain plants and animals, could be affected; (c) farming, fishing, and forestry could be disrupted; and (d) human health and animal habitats may be harmed either directly or indirectly.

Agriculture and Climate Change

Agriculture contributes to the release of greenhouse gases, which can add to the rising temperatures. However, agriculture can also help reduce climate change by playing a positive role (IISD & IES, March 1997). Better land management practices can act as natural sinks for greenhouse gases. A warmer climate can offer both opportunities and challenges for agriculture. Longer growing seasons and warmer temperatures could allow for the cultivation of new crops and more diverse farming. On the other hand, a hotter climate may also bring more extreme weather, pests, and soil erosion.

Adapting to climate change is important for the long-term sustainability of agriculture. As mentioned earlier, countries in temperate and polar regions might benefit from rising temperatures, as it could improve their agricultural productivity. However, countries in tropical and subtropical areas are likely to face more challenges.

Climate Change and Agriculture in Nepal

It's remarkable that within just 200 km from north to south, Nepal's climate ranges from arctic to tropical. The country experiences four main seasons: spring, summer, autumn, and winter. The average yearly temperature is about 15°C, rising from north to south, with some exceptions in the valleys. Nepal's average annual rainfall is around 1800 mm, but due to its diverse terrain, it varies significantly—from over 5000 mm in the south to less than 250 mm in the north. This uneven distribution of rainfall is a concern, as it contributes to floods, landslides, and other extreme events, especially during the monsoon season when heavy rainfall coincides with snowmelt in the mountains.

Agriculture employs about 65% of Nepal's population, but because it is mainly subsistence farming, it only contributes about 38% to the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Since Nepal's economy is heavily dependent on tourism and agriculture, it is particularly vulnerable to changes in the climate. Hydropower, which is the primary source of electricity and has great growth potential, is also at risk due to climate change, especially from glacier lake outbursts. Nepal could face climate change impacts in several areas, including hydropower, irrigation, domestic water supply, and natural disasters. According to research by the Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, Nepal's average temperature is rising by about 0.06°C each year. However, the temperature in the Himalayas is increasing at an even faster pace, which could have serious consequences for the country's glacial lakes. While no clear trends in overall precipitation have been established, there is evidence of more intense rainfall events. Glacial lake outbursts could damage hydropower projects and trigger floods and landslides. At the same time, glacier retreats have been observed, which could reduce water flow during the dry season. As a result of climate change and rising temperatures, Nepal could face drier periods during dry seasons and heavier monsoon rains, potentially up to three times the current rainfall, leading to floods and landslides that would affect agriculture and livelihoods (Alan M, Regmi B.R., 2005).

Around 80% of Nepal's water is used for irrigation. Studies on rice production suggest that with a 4°C temperature increase and 20% more precipitation, rice yields might increase slightly (by 0.09 to 5.5%), but beyond that, yields would start to decline. For maize, rising temperatures would reduce yields, while results for wheat were mixed. Changes in temperature and precipitation will also affect the water cycle and resources. As Nepal’s agricultural sector is highly dependent on weather, these changes could have severe effects. Glacier retreats, combined with higher temperatures, increased evaporation, reduced soil moisture, and less winter precipitation, could lead to droughts from November to April. Low rainfall during key phases of crop development could drastically reduce crop yields and livestock numbers and productivity.

In addition, less precipitation and reduced moisture availability would negatively impact grasslands, fodder, and forage production, while heat stress would lower livestock productivity. Although these challenges could be mitigated by investing in irrigation systems or importing more food, Nepal's limited resources may make these solutions difficult to implement. On the other hand, heavy monsoon rains combined with snowmelt in the mountains could cause floods during the rainy season, damaging not only agriculture and livestock but also the livelihoods of many people. This could lead to lower crop yields and reduced livestock productivity, which, without sufficient imports, could threaten food security in Nepal (Alan M, Regmi B.R., 2005).

 

Technology and Policy options

The tenth plan includes some emergency measures, such as building emergency shelters and providing housing for families affected by disasters. However, considering the significant impact of climate change, policies are also needed to both slow down climate change and help people adapt to its effects (Alan M, Regmi B.R., 2005). As discussed earlier in this paper, actions must be taken to reduce the amount and rate of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Policies could include environmental taxes on nitrogen fertilizers, promoting better timing for applying fertilizers and manure, developing rice varieties that emit less methane, improving livestock feed quality, enhancing livestock waste management, and expanding agroforestry practices.

On the adaptation side, strategies could involve breeding crops, vegetables, livestock, and fish that are more tolerant to higher temperatures, creating affordable water conservation technologies, developing early warning systems for droughts and floods, preparing relief and rehabilitation plans, and implementing land-use systems that stabilize slopes to reduce the risks of soil erosion and landslides. Additionally, building livestock shelters and food storage facilities could help lessen the impact of extreme weather conditions on agriculture and people's livelihoods (IISD & IES, 1997).

Conclusions and Recommendations

Human activities have combined with natural climate change, making its rapid progression unavoidable. However, with serious preparation and actions starting now, we can hopefully slow down this process and gradually adapt to the fast-changing climate. In the context of agriculture, efforts should focus on reducing its contribution to climate change by cutting greenhouse gas emissions, as well as taking steps to mitigate and adapt to climate impacts. Institutional actions are also needed to improve national preparedness, ensuring that vulnerable low-income groups remain food secure. Agricultural development should not only aim to increase productivity but also prioritize diversity and resilience in the sector.

REFERENCES

1. The Independent, May 9, 2007, page 1, column 2.

2. Alan M, Regmi B.R., 2005, Adverse Impacts of Climate Change on Development of Nepal: Integrating Adaptation into Policies and Activities, Capacity Strengthening of Least Developed Countries for Adaptation to Climate Change (CLACC).

3. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the Institute for Environmental Studies (IES), March 1997, Agriculture and Climate Change: A Prairie Perspective, University of Toronto.

4. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), October 1995, Agriculture and Climate Change, RCA Issue Brief # 3, United States Department of Agriculture.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post